Youth Ministry and the Bible. . . Paper? Or Digital?

I’ve been having this conversation with youth workers ever since we kicked off our Digital Kids Initiative several years ago. And, because we youth workers have a tendency to jump into the river of what’s trending with little or no pause, this conversation is necessary. The conversations are always spirited when we get to talking about the benefits and liabilities of the printed page vs digital screens when it comes to reading. . . especially when young eyes are focused on reading the Bible.

It’s a good thing that more and more people are pondering whether or not it matters how our kids access the Bible. The conversation is centered on whether we should encourage kids to read the actual physical bound paper Bible (old school), or off of a digital screen (new school). While we should be thrilled when our kids just read the Bible (on paper or screen!), I have become more convinced of the importance of pointing our kids to the actual physical, printed Bible. It’s not an age thing for me. Rather, it’s a research thing.

It seems that thanks to digital screens, kids are starting to read differently than before. Reading from a screen promotes cursory reading, hurried and distracted thinking, and shallow learning. And when that screen offers simultaneous access to the Internet, attention is easily broken. Kids are no longer reading in deep, contemplative, and focused ways. . . which is disturbing when you think about how they should be reading the Bible. Maybe the way that we and students prefer to read is really not preferable at all.

A review of the research conducted on paper vs. screen since 1992 found that students are able to better comprehend information in print for texts that are more than a page in length. Scrolling disrupts comprehension. Researchers Patricia Alexander and Lauren Singer took these studies a step further, finding the following. . .

  • Students overwhelming preferred to read digitally.
  • Reading was significantly faster online than in print.
  • Students judged their comprehension as better online than in print.
  • Paradoxically, overall comprehension was better for print versus digital reading.
  • The medium didn’t matter for general questions (like understanding the main idea of the text).
  • But when it came to specific questions, comprehension was significantly better when participants read printed texts.

The Bible is a complete story – a redemptive drama – that plays out from Genesis to Revelation. Holding a physical Bible serves to help us see and even feel the rich flow, unity, and context of God’s Word. In addition, reading a paper Bible encourages the kind of reading and attention the Bible deserves.

While it might raise our stock value among kids if we choose the screen exclusively, its ultimately learning and spiritual nurture that trumps our stock value. So. . . rather than using screen or paper exclusively, ease them back out of the screen and mix it up with the printed page.

Have any of you been addressing this issue? If so, how’s it working?


2 thoughts on “Youth Ministry and the Bible. . . Paper? Or Digital?

  1. I am in favor of both screen and print, but I have been thinking about this too, not so much in terms of attention/distraction, but in terms of reading Scripture in context (something we’ve largely failed to do even before the screen!) Recently, when a student read from a screen, and asked a question about it, I let my eyes drift across my printed page to the previous chapter and provided the answer from context. When we read on a screen, we only have one screen a time – no physical depth. When we read one screen at a time, it’s harder to realize that Isaiah is 66 chapters long, and Amos is 9.

    You mention feeling the rich flow of the redemptive drama. I so agree. When you flip to Genesis or Exodus in the paper Bible, you know you are at the beginning of the story. When you end the OT in Malachi, you feel the uncertainty of the middle. When you turn the last page of Revelation, you have satisfaction that God wins decisively.

    People talk about the problem of a “flat interpretation” of the Bible*. I wonder if our flat screens will contribute to it.

    * flat interpretation:

  2. Good stuff as usual, thanks! I’ve been blessed to serve in youth ministry for about 15 years and I’m more and more convinced that the “old school” paper Bible is the way to go. I strongly encourage our students to bring their paper Bibles each week to youth group and I often say, “We celebrate” the Bible in our youth group. Reading from a screen is better than nothing at all, but I think there is great benefit to physically carrying around and reading from the paper Bible. I have a Bible app on my phone and use it from time to time, but if the godly men and women from history read from the paper Bible, I want to do the same!

    Plus, there are inherent distractions that come with using your phone as a Bible exclusively, such as getting a text pop up or quickly checking social media. These distractions are reduced greatly when reading from the paper Bible and silencing your cell phone while doing it. This is a topic I’m passionate about as I’ve seen it’s great benefit in my own life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Our Blog